Fossil‑free bio‑LNG
The right pathway to net‑zero

Bio‑LNG is now. It stands at the forefront of decarbonizing heavy transport: a sector notoriously hard to electrify. But not all bio‑LNG production paths are equally sustainable. Some drive real change. Others maintain the status quo. In the race to net‑zero by 2050, the method matters. That’s why we must look beyond the label and understand the long‑term impact of each type of bio‑LNG.

Making bio‑LNG by greening fossil methane doesn’t reduce our fossil fuel dependence. To achieve net‑zero emissions by 2050, it is crucial to support onsite biogas liquefaction. This production pathway is local, transparent and uses only renewable molecules. It produces real bio‑LNG, fossil‑free.

Compare 3 types of bio-LNG

The bio‑LNG market dilemma

Today, we face a critical dilemma:

  • Accelerate the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors by scaling the bio-LNG market more quickly – even by greening fossil molecules
  • Reducing dependence on fossil energy imports by only using renewable molecules

Both goals are of critical importance for the EU and other economies. But, while all bio-LNG production routes may have some contribution to these goals today, only onsite biogas liquefaction aligns with long-term sustainability and fossil energy independence.

Truly fossil-free production
At Nordsol, we address this challenge by continually advancing our technology. By making onsite biogas liquefaction more efficient, scalable, and cost-effective, we’re enabling truly fossil-free production. Other routes may grow the bio-LNG market faster today, but we’ve shown that locally produced bio-LNG can compete when all societal costs are considered.

Our technology

Not all bio‑LNG is ready for a net‑zero
future. Only onsite liquefaction creates a
pathway to true independence from
fossil resources.

Bio‑LNG production routes:
three paths, one choice

Should we scale fast with greened fossil gas, or invest in a future built on true sustainability and fossil energy independence? Understanding the three production routes is essential.

Learn more @FAQ
Centralized
liquefaction
Mostly natural gas greened with certificates
  • High dependence on fossil molecules (today)
  • High dependence on imported fuels (today)
  • Medium hidden emissions
  • Medium costs of production
  • Medium scaling limitations
  • Medium hidden costs (Network infrastructure)
  • Medium long-term sustainability risk
Onsite
liquefaction
Onsite liquefaction at biogas production site
  • No dependence on fossil molecules
  • No dependence on imported fuels
  • No ​hidden emissions
  • Medium costs of production (initially)
  • Medium scaling limitations
  • No hidden costs
  • Low long-term sustainability risk
Terminal
liquefaction
Fossil LNG greened with certificates
  • High dependence on fossil molecules
  • High dependence on imported fuels
  • High hidden emissions
  • Low costs of production
  • Low scaling limitations
  • High hidden costs (Network infrastructure and geo-political dependence)
  • High long-term sustainability risk

Fossil‑free vs. mass‑balanced: the fundamental difference

The key difference is the methane source. Fossil-free bio-LNG contains biomethane molecules from organic waste. In mass-balanced bio-LNG and greened LNG, the methane molecules are fossil but carry the green characteristics of a biomethane molecule.

Net-zero implications
In a net-zero system, every emitted greenhouse gas molecule must be balanced by removing an equivalent amount from the air. Nature can handle this for short-cycle emissions, but fossil emissions – from the long carbon cycle – will need costly technologies to remove and store the carbon. Fossil-free bio-LNG works within the short carbon cycle, using already-circulating carbon. Thus, it does not rely on fossil resources.

This fundamental difference aligns onsite liquefaction with net-zero objectives, while fossil-dependent routes face challenges as regulations tighten.

Join the bio-LNG movement

Nordsol’s smart, energy‑efficient technology
enables local, circular solutions and viable
business cases. However, aligned policy is
crucial to scale impact and meet EU 2050 goals.

From hidden to honest: Emissions of conventional LNG

LNG from fossil sources – especially North America – has a large carbon footprint. Methane leaks, intensive gas treatment and liquefaction, and long-distance shipping cause major upstream emissions, up to 38% of total impact¹ , that are not properly reflected in the reported greenhouse gas emissions of conventional LNG.

Fossil-free bio-LNG’s transparent climate impact
Fossil-free bio-LNG emissions are fully known. Unlike conventional LNG with its hidden upstream footprint, bio-LNG’s life-cycle emissions are fully accounted for. Methane is captured from organic waste, which significantly reduces decomposition emissions. Energy consumption in the production process is also fully included in the carbon footprint.

Learn more at FAQ

¹ See: Fischedick et al. (2023), Energy Science & Engineering,
via Wiley Online Library

Fossil‑free bio‑LNG isn’t a label.
It’s a commitment to a truly
independent, circular energy future.
Let’s move now. Together.

Policy alignment needed for energy independence

Onsite liquefaction ensures immediate climate impact while building truly sustainable systems. But policy must make sustainable routes economically attractive. Without appropriate policy support, less sustainable routes may dominate despite limited contribution to energy independence.

Share your thoughts

Let’s move from fossil‑ dependent to fossil‑free

The road to net-zero starts with today’s choices. Only onsite liquefaction truly breaks with fossil dependency. Mass-balanced and greened LNG remain tied to fossil resources.

Nordsol’s onsite biogas liquefaction technology stands out with unique benefits:

  • Fossil-free bio-LNG: CH₄ molecules sourced entirely from local organic waste
  • Independence: from gas grid connections and capacity constraints
  • Efficient transport: 4.3 times less transportation to LNG service stations
  • Clean production process: enables negative carbon emissions
  • Zero methane slip: our closed system ensures no methane escapes during production
  • Local circular economies: creates value and jobs within regional communities
  • Tailored implementation: adaptable technology designed for new projects and existing biogas upgrading facilities

Fossil-free ready isn’t a label. It’s a commitment to a truly independent, circular energy future.

Let’s move. now. Together.

Join the fossil‑free
bio‑LNG movement

We can’t drive this change alone, and we know we’re not alone. If you share our vision, we’d love to hear what drives you.

Frequently Asked Questions About fossil‑free bio‑LNG
Here are the most frequently asked questions about our technology, its impact, and how it fits into the transition to a net-zero energy system.
Fossil-free bio-LNG
Bio-LNG, liquefied biogas (LBG) or liquefied biomethane (LBM)?
What makes fossil-free bio-LNG carbon neutral?
How does fossil-free ready bio-LNG fit into the EU’s renewable energy directives?
What are the CO₂ reduction benefits of fossil-free ready bio-LNG?
How does Nordsol’s technology ensure zero methane slip?
How does onsite liquefaction contribute to energy independence?
Is fossil-free ready bio-LNG more expensive to produce?
Can any biogas producer switch to fossil-free ready bio-LNG production?
Can fossil-free ready bio-LNG be used in all LNG-powered vehicles and ships?
Mass-balancing
What is mass-balancing and why is transparency important?
Why is transparency important in renewable fuel certification systems?
What are the hidden costs of centralized liquefaction?